Abstract
Transportation infrastructure can cause an ecological trap if it attracts wildlife for foraging and travel opportunities, while increasing the risk of mortality from collisions. This situation occurs for a vulnerable population of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in Banff National Park, Canada, where train strikes have become a leading cause of mortality. We explored this problem with analyses of rail-associated food attractants, habitat use of GPS-collared bears and patterns of past mortality. Bears appeared to be attracted to grain spilled from rail cars, enhanced growth of adjacent vegetation and train-killed ungulates with rail use that increased in spring and autumn, and in areas where trains slowed, topography was rugged, and human density was low. However, areas with higher grain deposits or greater use by bears did not predict sites of past mortality. The onset of reported train strikes occurred amid several other interacting changes in this landscape, including the cessation of lethal bear management, changes in the distribution and abundance of ungulates, increasing human use and new anthropogenic features. We posit that rapid learning by bears is critical to their persistence in this landscape and that this capacity might be enhanced to prevent train strikes in future with simple warning devices, such as the one we invented, that signal approaching trains.This article is part of the theme issue ‘Linking behaviour to dynamics of populations and communities: application of novel approaches in behavioural ecology to conservation’.
Highlights
Road and railway networks are among the human infrastructure that can attract wildlife with apparent benefits, while imposing net costs to individuals, to cause population declines known as ecological traps [1,2]
We found evidence that the railway supplements grizzly bear diet in the form of enhanced vegetation growth, comparable to what occurs for roads [6]
We wondered what else had changed in this landscape over the past few decades with relevance to bear mortality. We speculate about those changes below in the spirit of a prophesy voiced by a PCA official who launched the research initiative in 2011: just as we found no silver bullets for potential mitigation, we [tried to ensure we] overlooked no sacred cows of potential causation
Summary
Road and railway networks are among the human infrastructure that can attract wildlife with apparent benefits, while imposing net costs to individuals, to cause population declines known as ecological traps [1,2]. Growing evidence shows that wildlife –train collisions substantially impact some populations, when railways provide food that attracts wildlife [24] or when they traverse wilderness areas containing wide-ranging species [25,26] These negative impacts have been documented for several other populations of grizzly or brown bears [27,28,29] for which rail-caused mortality sometimes exceeds that of roads [27,29]. Carnivores may be especially likely to do this because they are capable of rapid adaptation to new anthropogenic features [32,33] and exhibit behavioural responses to roads that accommodate changing traffic volume [34], types of crossing structures [35] and locations for specific activities [36] This combined context supported our study in Banff and Yoho National Parks, Canada, with goals to understand the root causes of grizzly bear vulnerability to train mortality and recommend effective forms of mitigation. We synthesize our research contributions to that initiative, show why there is no simple environmental explanation for bear vulnerability to train strikes, emphasize the necessity of individual learning in this rapidly changing environment, 2 and describe a warning device with which managers might accelerate learning by wildlife to detect approaching trains, preventing population-level ecological traps
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.