Abstract
Too much geographical explanation has simply ignored the impact of nonhumans on the geography of humans. It has also failed to acknowledge the multitude of ways in which humans, in their sociospatial practices, impact on animals. Animal geography offers, on the one hand, a concern with how we use animals to define us (and our spaces) by their difference and, on the other, a more radical attention to ways in which those differences actually matter little as animals, like us, become correlational partners in spatial practice.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
