Abstract

There is increasing societal concern surrounding the environmental externalities generated from ruminant production systems. Traditional responses to address these externalities have often been system-based. While these approaches have had promising results, they have served to view the animal as a problem that needs solving, rather than as a potential solution. This review attempts to answer the question: can we breed animals that are more environmentally friendly to address environmental outcomes and satisfy consumer demand? This was done by exploring the literature of examples where animals have been specifically bred to reduce their environmental impact. The use of milk urea nitrogen breeding values has been demonstrated as a tool allowing for selective breeding of dairy cows to reduce nitrogen losses. Low milk urea nitrogen breeding values have been documented to result in reduced urinary nitrogen concentrations per urination event, which ultimately reduces the level of nitrogen that will be lost from the system. The ability to breed for low methane emissions has also shown positive results, with several studies demonstrating the heritability and subsequent reductions in methane emissions via selective breeding programs. Several avenues also exist where animals can be selectively bred to increase the nutrient density of their final product, and thus help to address the growing demand for nutrient-dense food for a growing human population. Animal-based solutions are permanent, cumulative, and often more cost-effective than system-based approaches. With continuing research and interest in breeding for more positive environmental outcomes, the animal can now start to be viewed as a potential solution to many of the issues faced by ruminant production systems, rather than simply being seen as a problem.

Highlights

  • Published: 20 September 2021There is increasing global concern about the environmental costs of ruminant animal production

  • Dietary protein represents the main source of ammonia production for ruminants, which is used to meet the requirements of cellulolytic bacteria within the rumen [39]

  • Milk urea nitrogen (MUN) measurements are preferable over blood urea nitrogen (BUN), as BUN is highly variable as a result of digestive processes, and peaks 4–6 h after feeding [47]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Published: 20 September 2021There is increasing global concern about the environmental costs of ruminant animal production. In temperate pastoral dairy production systems, two of the main environmental concerns are nitrogen (N) losses to the environment and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). N not being used for animal production [1], with approximately 60% of this surplus N being excreted as urinary N [2,3]. High concentrations of N in the urine patch saturates the soil and the swards’ ability to utilize the N, making it vulnerable to being lost from the system [6].

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.