Abstract
BackgroundTo measure angle-to-angle (ATA) and spur-to-spur (STS) distances along six meridians using high-resolution swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and to compare those values with horizontal white-to-white (WTW) distance.Methods68 eyes from 68 patients were quantitatively assessed with the Anterion SS-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). ATA and STS distances were measured with the SS-OCT’s B-Scan in six cross-sectional images corresponding to the vertical (6–12 o’clock), 1–7 o’clock, 2–8 o’clock, horizontal (3–9 o’clock), 4–10 o’clock and 5–11 o’clock meridians. WTW was measured horizontally with the device’s infrared camera. A Pearson correlation analysis was carried out to compare ATA and STS distances with WTW.ResultsThe largest values were found for the vertical meridian and the shortest for the 2–8 o’clock meridian, both for ATA and STS distances. No statistically significant differences were found between WTW, ATA and STS along the horizontal meridian (p > 0.1). However, ATA and STS showed statistically significant differences elsewhere, except for the horizontal and the 2–8 o’clock meridians (p > 0.05). Moreover, we found that ATA and STS varied significantly depending on the meridian being assessed, except for ATA at 4–10 versus 3–9 o’clock and for STS at 4–10 versus 3–9 o’clock and at 3–9 versus 2–8 o’clock (p > 0.1). R2 values ranged from 0.49 to 0.75 for ATA and STS at the different meridians, showing the best correlation at 3–9 o’clock meridian (0.64 and 0.75, respectively) and the worst at 6–12 o’clock meridian (R2 = 0.49 for both ATA and STS).ConclusionsATA and STS distances vary radially, thus showing that the anterior chamber is vertically oval. Therefore, it is advisable to measure these two distances along the meridian to be used.
Highlights
To measure angle-to-angle (ATA) and spur-to-spur (STS) distances along six meridians using highresolution swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and to compare those values with horizontal white-to-white (WTW) distance
Measuring distances in the anterior segment of the eye has become important for clinical diagnosis and to estimate the size of those phakic intraocular lenses (IOL) used to treat refractive errors
The truth is that angle-to-angle (ATA) or spurto-spur (STS) distances are the most appropriate values to calculate the size of anterior-segment phakic IOLs
Summary
To measure angle-to-angle (ATA) and spur-to-spur (STS) distances along six meridians using highresolution swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and to compare those values with horizontal white-to-white (WTW) distance. The use of non-invasive high-resolution swept-source OCT (SSOCT) has increased, despite the fact that sulcus-tosulcus cannot be measured Notwithstanding this fact, Oh et al [11] reported that UBM-measured sulcus-tosulcus and ATA diameters were significantly correlated for 4 meridians (45°, 90°, 135° and 180°). Some authors claim that it is better to estimate sulcus size using ATA rather than WTW as an alternative to measuring with an UBM [17] Considering these outcomes, OCT-based ATA values may be useful and valid for posterior-chamber phakic lens size calculation
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.