Angioscopic findings 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion

Abstract

BackgroundChronic total occlusion (CTO) is a high-risk factor for stent thrombosis, but little is known about the difference in neointimal healing between CTO and non-CTO lesions regarding implanted stents. We investigated factors affecting neointimal healing after stent implantation for CTO and non-CTO lesions using angioscopy. MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 106 stents in 85 consecutive patients between March 2016 and July 2020. Their average age was 68 ± 11 years, and participants (73 male and 12 female) underwent follow-up angiography and angioscopy 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The stents (n = 106) were divided into three groups according to the lesion status at the previous PCI: CTO (n = 17), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n = 35), and stable coronary artery disease without CTO or non-CTO (n = 54). ResultsThe neointimal stent coverage grade was significantly lower in the CTO and ACS groups than in the non-CTO group (0.4 ± 0.5, 0.9 ± 0.8, and 1.4 ± 0.8, respectively, p < 0.001). Thrombi were significantly more frequent in CTO and ACS than in non-CTO (71 %, 51 %, and 15 %, respectively, p < 0.001). The yellow grade in CTO was comparable to that in ACS but significantly higher in CTO than in non-CTO (CTO vs. ACS vs. non-CTO 1.5 ± 0.7, 1.4 ± 0.6, and 0.9 ± 0.7, respectively, p = 0.007). ConclusionsDelayed healing occurs in stents implanted for CTO lesions. Longer dual-antithrombotic therapy may be beneficial.