Angiographic and long-term outcomes of "rescue" stenting versus PTCA in failed thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction.

Abstract

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), when performed early after clinically failed thrombolysis, improves acute infarct-artery patency in up to 90% of cases. Limited data are available regarding the role of rescue stenting in this setting. From January 1995 to December 1999, the authors studied all consecutive patients treated with rescue PTCA or rescue stenting within 12 hours of onset of chest pain and clinically failed thrombolytic therapy at their institution. Baseline demographic characteristics, infarct-related artery location, lesion class, left ventricular function, and incidence of multivessel disease were similar between groups (23 patients in each group). Preprocedural TIMI flow 0 was more common in PTCA patients (p=0.025). Quantitative coronary analysis revealed similar incidence of calcification, thrombus burden, minimal lumen diameter (MLD), and lesion length between groups. Post-procedural TIMI 3 flow was more common in stent patients; however, this was not statistically significant (p=0.18). Greater final MLD (p<0.001), less residual stenosis (p<0.001), and a trend toward larger reference vessel diameter (p=0.13) were observed in favor of stent patients. At 6-month follow-up, there was no difference in the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or readmission for unstable angina between groups. More stent patients (60% vs 27%, p=0.06) were angina free as compared to PTCA patients. Despite similar in-hospital clinical outcomes, the study suggests better angiographic results and 6-month orbidity with rescue stenting.