Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Angio PLanewave UltraSensitive imaging (Angio PL.U.S.) as an alternative to contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) for endoleak detection and classification in patients after endovascular aneurysm repair. A total of 28 patients underwent a post-endovascular aneurysm repair follow-up with color Doppler ultrasound, power Doppler ultrasound, CEUS, Angio PL.U.S and CTA examinations. CTA revealed 17 endoleaks in 14 patients (50%): 3 type Ia, 13 type II and 1 type III. There were no differences between Angio PL.U.S. and CEUS in terms of sensitivity, specificity or accuracy (93%, 100% and 97%). We did not observe any statistically significant differences between CTA, CEUS and Angio PL.U.S. in terms of the endoleak identification ability. Angio PL.U.S. may be considered as a potential tool to follow-up patients after endovascular aneurysm repair implantation, especially in patients who cannot be examined with CTA or CEUS.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call