Abstract
Why is memory politics such a contested field? Why is it so hard to change narratives, overcome enemy images, and draw “objective” pictures of the past? In what way can works of art break the ice and promote “dangerous memories” (Bekerman/Zembylas 2012, 22)? How can works of art, and especially literature, use their aesthetic potential to help achieve attitude changes?In this paper, I examine these questions through the lens of literary criticism. I focus on Maja Haderlap’s novel Angel of Oblivion in order to illustrate several typical features of (not just) Austria’s memory politics after World War II: on the one hand, Austria’s claim as Hitler’s first victim; the depreciation of the (Slovenian) anti-fascist partisans; the relativization of Nazi crimes by pointing at the (real or fictional) crimes of Yugoslav communists, and as a consequence the denial of the minority rights of Carinthian (and Styrian) Slovenians. And on the other hand, the struggle for a democratic and honest memory culture – not only within Austria’s borders but beyond, in the entire “Alps-Adriatic” region. Haderlap’s book is itself a wonderful example of the success of this ongoing endeavour.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.