Abstract
ANESTHESIA and anesthetic methods have properly concerned the surgical profession as its technical procedures have been perfected. Without adequate anesthesia, an otherwise ideal technical procedure is a matter of trial to the surgeon and a physiologic burden to the patient. Yet the acceptance of anesthetic methods by the surgeon for application to his patients reveals a curious picture of diversity and sectionalism. As far back as 1922 an editorial in the Lancet 1 posed this unanswered query: It would be interesting to ascertain why it is that in England and America general anesthesia has been developed at the expense of local, . . .
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
