Abstract
In this single-case study of memory distortion where Andrew Mayes was involved as an expert witness, a surgeon falsely recalled aspects of a patient safety adverse event in which he was involved, and where he was put through an investigatory process by a regulatory body. Andrew Mayes’ expert analysis of the role of memory distortion in this case resulted in the surgeon being exonerated.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.