Abstract
ABSTRACT In ancient households, it was not always the son who was born first who was granted the birthright. There were certain circumstances in which the father would prefer his younger son over him. But did the first-born son, when realizing that his status was threatened, submissively accept his fathers’ intentions to deprive him of his status? This question is examined in the light of the stories about Reuben (Gen 30,14-18; 35,22a). Jacob’s inclination to prefer the son of Rachel prompted Reuben to act in order to secure his status as the first-born. His awareness of the crucial power of influence of a dominant mother made him act in order to strengthen the position of his mother, Leah, and in this way to make her able to influence Jacob to grant him the birthright.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
