Abstract

BackgroundFew existing protein-protein interface design methods allow for extensive backbone rearrangements during the design process. There is also a dichotomy between redesign methods, which take advantage of the native interface, and de novo methods, which produce novel binders.MethodologyHere, we propose a new method for designing novel protein reagents that combines advantages of redesign and de novo methods and allows for extensive backbone motion. This method requires a bound structure of a target and one of its natural binding partners. A key interaction in this interface, the anchor, is computationally grafted out of the partner and into a surface loop on the design scaffold. The design scaffold's surface is then redesigned with backbone flexibility to create a new binding partner for the target. Careful choice of a scaffold will bring experimentally desirable characteristics into the new complex. The use of an anchor both expedites the design process and ensures that binding proceeds against a known location on the target. The use of surface loops on the scaffold allows for flexible-backbone redesign to properly search conformational space.Conclusions and SignificanceThis protocol was implemented within the Rosetta3 software suite. To demonstrate and evaluate this protocol, we have developed a benchmarking set of structures from the PDB with loop-mediated interfaces. This protocol can recover the correct loop-mediated interface in 15 out of 16 tested structures, using only a single residue as an anchor.

Highlights

  • Because so many human diseases are caused by dysregulation of proteins or protein-protein interactions, the need to experimentally or therapeutically adjust these systems is great

  • To demonstrate and evaluate this protocol, we have developed a benchmarking set of structures from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with loop-mediated interfaces

  • Placing past successes in context, it remains quite challenging to create binding partners with desired functionality, and even minor successes are not routine.[3,4]. This is because interface design combines all the challenges of protein design, itself an incompletely solved problem, with the additional complication of docking orientation between the two proteins

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Because so many human diseases are caused by dysregulation of proteins or protein-protein interactions, the need to experimentally or therapeutically adjust these systems is great. Many authors have introduced computational methods for creating these tool proteins, including both de novo binding partners and redesigns of existing interfaces.[1] One modeling suite used for this purpose, and many others, is Rosetta.[2]. Placing past successes in context, it remains quite challenging to create binding partners with desired functionality, and even minor successes are not routine.[3,4] This is because interface design combines all the challenges of protein design, itself an incompletely solved problem, with the additional complication of docking orientation between the two proteins. Few existing protein-protein interface design methods allow for extensive backbone rearrangements during the design process. There is a dichotomy between redesign methods, which take advantage of the native interface, and de novo methods, which produce novel binders

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call