Anatomical considerations of the iliac crest on percutaneous endoscopic discectomy using a transforaminal approach

Abstract

Background ContextPercutaneous endoscopic discectomy is a minimally invasive procedure for the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). It can be performed under local anesthesia and requires a skin incision of only 8 mm, with minimal disruption of the spinal structures including ligaments and muscles. However, performing percutaneous endoscopic discectomy with a transforaminal approach (TF-PED) for the lower lumbar spine is associated with some anatomical problems, such as interference from the iliac crest. This study sought to assess the operability of TF-PED for the lower lumbar spine. PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess a three-dimensional relationship between the trajectory of TF-PED and the iliac crest, and the operability of TF-PED at the lower lumbar disc levels (L4–L5 and L5–S1) using CT images. Study DesignThis is a retrospective study using 323 multiplanar abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans. Patient SampleWe retrospectively reviewed contrast-enhanced multiplanar abdominal CT scans of 323 consecutive patients (203 male and 120 female) in our hospital from April 2009 to March 2013. The mean age was 66.5 (range 15–89) years old. Outcome MeasuresThe operability of the TF-PED was the outcome measure. Materials and MethodsWe defined the tangent line in the iliac crest and the superior articular process of the caudal spine as the trajectory line of TF-PED, and evaluated the maximum inclination angle of the trajectory of the TF-PED (α angle) at the L4–L5 and the L5–S1 disc levels. Assuming the use of an oblique viewing endoscope at 25°, we defined α angle≥65° as the operability of TF-PED. Results(1) Relationship between iliac crest and disc level: The trajectory of the TF-PED interfered with the iliac crest at L4–L5 in 40.2% (right) and 54.5% (left) of the subjects, and at L5–S1 in 99.7% and 100% of the subjects. (2) The maximum inclination angle of the trajectory of TF-PED: the α angles were 84.3° and 82.3° at the L4–L5, and 56.8° and 55.2° at L5–S1. (3) Laterality of the α angle: At both disc levels, the mean age of the subjects with a laterality of ≥10° was significantly higher than that of subjects with a laterality of <10°. (4) Operability of TF-PED: At L4–L5, TF-PED could be performed in 94.4% and 90.4% of the subjects. In contrast, at L5–S1 the procedure could be performed in 24.1% and 19.2% of the subjects (male: 15.8% and 10.8%, female: 38.3% and 33.3%). ConclusionsFrom the results of this study, the trajectory of TF-PED can be limited by the surrounding anatomical structures. The maximum inclination angle indicated that treatment for the central type of LDH at the L5–S1 disc level was considered more difficult than that at the L4–L5 disc level because of the iliac crest. In the clinical setting, such anatomical particularities can be overcome by using a more perpendicular approach (hand-down technique) with the possible addition of a foraminoplasty. Moreover, we found that we must consider the laterality of the trajectory of TF-PED in terms of the patients' age or sex.