Abstract
Currently, standard practice is to use the continuous suturing technique on the bronchial anastomosis during lung transplantation. This study used a large cohort to investigate and contrast continuous and interrupted suturing techniques, comparing survival outcomes and occurrence of postoperative bronchial complications to examine if utilization of interrupted suturing has merit. Survival outcomes of 740 single-center lung transplant recipients over 8y (February 2012-March 2020) were compared by suturing techniques: either continuous or interrupted at the bronchial anastomosis. Clinical parameters and demographics were compared between two suturing groups, with P values<0.05 considered significant. The groups were compared for postoperative morbidity, including need for bronchial interventions. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Cox regression analysis was run with statistically significant variables to study association with survival. Of the 740 patients, 462 received the continuous suturing technique and 278 received the interrupted suturing technique. Most demographic and clinical data were not statistically significant between the two groups, and those that were significant were not associated with worse survival outcomes, with the exception of the variable diagnosis. Bronchial complications were comparable between the continuous and interrupted groups (12.6% versus 10.4%, P=0.382). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use did not differ significantly between the two groups (P=0.12). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed comparable survival between groups (P=0.98), and Cox regression analysis showed that only diagnosis, bronchial complications, and ECMO utilization were associated with different survival outcomes. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder was shown to be associated with more favorable survival outcomes as opposed to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and the category "other". The need for ECMO and the occurrence of a bronchial complication were also associated with worse survival outcomes. Both techniques showed reasonable post-transplant outcomes, as our study demonstrated similar survival outcomes and bronchial complication rates.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have