Abstract

Telugu, a Dravidian language spoken in Southern India, has three anaphoric expressions. The main purpose of this paper explores anaphoric expressions in Telugu. Telugu employs a verbal reflexive marker, kun, to express reflexivity in addition to complex nominal reflexives such as tana-ni tanu and pronominal reflexives such as tana-n-e. The two forms of reflexives with the verbal reflexive marker must be bound by a local c-commanding antecedent. These constructions show that the syntactic conditions licensing reflexives preempt the verbal reflexive system licensing reflexives. Pronominal reflexives such as tana-n-e are unspecified or indeterminate with respect to the syntactic features such as [α pronominal]/[β anaphor]. When a verbal reflexive marker, kun, is not on verbs, tana-n-e cannot take a local c-commanding antecedent. The syntactic behavior of both nominal and verbal reflexives indicates that the presence of the verbal reflexive marker is not a sufficient and necessary condition for the reflexive interpretation. Thus, anaphoric expressions in Telugu requires principles of both syntactic conditions licensing anaphora as well as verbal reflexive system licensing reflexive predicates.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.