Analyzing the Scholarly Impact of Cardiothoracic Surgery Research Using the Relative Citation Ratio.

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recently developed the relative citation ratio (RCR), calculated as article citations benchmarked to NIH-funded publications in the same field. Here, we characterized the scholarly impact of academic cardiothoracic (CT) surgeons and their research using the RCR. Using a database of 992 CT surgeons, we calculated the RCR for all articles published by each surgeon since 1980 using the NIH iCite database. All data were collected from publicly available online sources. Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or as odds ratios (ORs) for multivariable logistic regression analysis. Where RCR 1.00 indicates equal impact as an NIH-funded publication, the RCR among all 37,402 CT surgery articles was 0.84 (0.33-1.83) and the RCR among NIH-funded CT surgery articles was 1.07 (0.53-2.17). CT surgeons exhibited a career median RCR of 0.82 (0.54-1.13) and maximum RCR of 6.20 (3.04-13.57). Predictors of career median RCR >1.00 included female gender (OR 2.23, P=0.001), thoracic subspecialization (OR 2.50, P<0.001), full professor rank (OR 1.89, P=0.001), and NIH funding (OR 1.75, P=0.001). Predictors of career maximum RCR >50th percentile among CT surgeons included male gender (OR 1.87, P=0.030), thoracic subspecialization (OR 2.05, P<0.001), full professor rank (OR 4.89, P<0.001), NIH funding (OR 3.17, P<0.001), and career duration (OR 1.03, P=0.002). We present the first assessment of the NIH-validated RCR for academic CT surgery. CT surgery research is highly impactful, although gender disparities persist with respect to the highest-impact research of our specialty.