Abstract
Background: Standard bibliometric methods used in dermatologic research include impact factor and citations. The Altmetric score is an adjunctive measure of article impact. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to examine the breadth of societal impact made by scientific articles in dermatology and investigate a correlation between an article’s impact factor and citations, with its Altmetric score. Methods: We reviewed 15 dermatology journals with the highest impact factors and analyzed the 10 most cited articles from 2013 and 2016 within those journals. We studied the articles’ Altmetric scores, number of citations, and social media mentions. Using Microsoft Excel, we performed statistical analysis with Pearson correlation coefficients and descriptive statistics. Results: Analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between citation count and Altmetric scores for articles published in 2013 (p=0.0009) and 2016 (p=0.003). Impact factor was also significantly associated with Altmetric scores across both years (p=0.002, p=0.0005). Conclusions: Altmetric score weakly corresponded with citation count and journal impact factor across cohorts. We conclude that Altmetric scores serve as an additional measurement of article impact in dermatology, though they are insufficient as a replacement for traditional measures at this time.
Highlights
Scientific research furthers our wealth of medical knowledge and can enact clinical change
Altmetric score weakly corresponded with citation count and journal impact factor across cohorts
We conclude that Altmetric scores serve as an additional measurement of article impact in dermatology, though they are insufficient as a replacement for traditional measures at this time
Summary
Scientific research furthers our wealth of medical knowledge and can enact clinical change. The question stands of how the impact of a single article can be determined. Various metrics seek to describe this impact. The publishing journal’s impact factor (IF) and the article’s citation count have traditionally served as the quantitative measures of an article’s impact.[1] These two metrics have limitations with the former yielding a generalization marker based on the journal rather than the article, and the latter making it difficult for authors and peers to see the true impact of a publication until years later, when substantial citation information has been accrued.[2,3]. Standard bibliometric methods used in dermatologic research include impact factor and citations. The Altmetric score is an adjunctive measure of article impact
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
