Abstract

Simple SummaryColorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most common cancers and the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Despite the identification of alterations in DNA repair genes and the resulting genomic instability in sub-populations of CRC, therapies that exploit defects in DNA repair pathways or high level of replicative stress have been explored only in breast, ovarian, and other tumor types, but not yet systematically in CRC. Here, we discuss how targeting genes involved in the responses to replication stress and the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) could provide new therapeutic opportunities to treat CRCs and have the potential to confer increased sensitivity to current chemotherapy regimens, thus, expanding the spectrum of therapy options, and potentially improving clinical outcomes for CRC patients.Despite the ample improvements of CRC molecular landscape, the therapeutic options still rely on conventional chemotherapy-based regimens for early disease, and few targeted agents are recommended for clinical use in the metastatic setting. Moreover, the impact of cytotoxic, targeted agents, and immunotherapy combinations in the metastatic scenario is not fully satisfactory, especially the outcomes for patients who develop resistance to these treatments need to be improved. Here, we examine the opportunity to consider therapeutic agents targeting DNA repair and DNA replication stress response as strategies to exploit genetic or functional defects in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathways through synthetic lethal mechanisms, still not explored in CRC. These include the multiple actors involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) through homologous recombination (HR), classical non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), and microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ), inhibitors of the base excision repair (BER) protein poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), as well as inhibitors of the DNA damage kinases ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR), CHK1, WEE1, and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM). We also review the biomarkers that guide the use of these agents, and current clinical trials with targeted DDR therapies.

Highlights

  • Standard of Care of Colorectal CancerSurveillance, and identification of clinical and molecular features holding significant prognostic value, colorectal cancer (CRC) still ranks the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide

  • POLQ expression in different cancer types strongly correlated with the expression of factors involved in response to replicative stress (RAD51, FANCD2, and BLM), instead of genes encoding for several core microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) proteins, factors involved in DNA end resection or in canonical non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) [212]

  • RAD51 and meiotic recombination 11 homolog (MRE11) are homologous recombination (HR) factors, the main pathway activated for resolving double-strand breaks (DSBs) during replication, and colorectal cancer (CRC)-SC are tolerable to high replication stress level due to modulation of DNA damage response [156]

Read more

Summary

Standard of Care of Colorectal Cancer

Surveillance, and identification of clinical and molecular features holding significant prognostic value, colorectal cancer (CRC) still ranks the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Stage III CRC is classified into high (T4, N1–2 or any, N2) and low (T1–3, N1) risk of recurrence In this setting, patients are always referred to adjuvant treatment with CAPEOX (capecitabine, oxaliplatin), FOLFOX or 5-FU/LV if oxaliplatin is not tolerated [15]. One explanation might be the insufficient use of systemic adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II CRC, since it is part of the standard care of treatment used in stage III CRC [18] Another inconsistency refers to the distinction between high and low risk in stage II disease, since a significant number of high-risk patients with pathological and or prognostic features of poor outcomes will not develop disease recurrence and vice-versa. Several clinicopathological and molecular features are known to be determinant on the disease prognosis, the majority of predictive biomarkers, which have reached clinical practice, are limited to metastatic setting

Molecular Classification of CRC Tumors
HR-Deficient Phenotypes in Colorectal Cancers
MMR-Deficient Phenotypes in Colorectal Cancers
Cellular Responses to DNA DSB
Results
Homologous Recombination Repair
Targeting MRE11 in CRC
RAD51 Inhibition
Alternative End-Joining
Polymerase Theta-Mediated End Joining
Single-Strand Annealing
Cell Cycle Checkpoint Inhibition
ATR Inhibition
CHK1 Inhibition
ATM Inhibition
WEE1 Inhibition
Clinical Trials of DDR Inhibitors in CRC Patients
Molecular Selection of CRC Patients for Clinical Trials with DDR Inhibitors
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call