Abstract
Multiverse is a popular concept embraced by many scholars, including physicists who support the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. However, the necessity of adding many extra entities to the traditional single universe is debatable. Bayesianism, which contends to utilize degrees of belief to measure our credence, is a suitable tool to be introduced in this debate. This paper discusses the reason for believing in the multiverse and utilizes Bayesianism, claiming that we should believe in the multiverse due to the fine-tuned constants. The fine-tuned universe and Bayes’ Rule are introduced, then the inverse gambler’s fallacy is explained to object to the reasoning of the multiverse. Subsequently, however, the paper raises examples and Bayesian calculations to argue that the multiverse is good reasoning. Finally, the paper concludes that the multiverse is good reasoning by using ‘selection effects’ to distinguish it from the inverse gambler’s fallacy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.