Abstract
This paper presents a study comparing the effectiveness of accounting-based and market-based models predicting financial distress. We examine various periods, including events from the 1970s to the 1990s, the impact of COVID-19, and the effect of APRA. Our findings demonstrate that an accounting-based distress model performs similarly to the market-based model of defaults. Furthermore, when we combine both sources of information, the resulting model outperforms either individual model. These results suggest that accounting and market-based information are mutually reinforcing when assessing distress levels in pricing.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
