Abstract

Fee-based Buy-Now-Pay-Later services (BNPL) are becoming widely adopted in many developed countries, including Australia. Across a variety of regulatory approaches there appears to be relatively minimal regulatory coverage of fee-based BNPL. This review applies a results-oriented, behaviourally informed market failure approach to assess the regulatory outcomes of fee-based BNPL. The review makes the case that the impacts of the regulation of fee-based BNPL in Australia demonstrate multiple forms of regulatory failure. The regulatory failure is particularly due to regulatory capture at a broad level and especially in terms of a lack of consumer protections. Consumers may particularly need consideration and protection because understanding the increasing complexity and financial knowledge at the heart of many fintech services is beyond the capability or responsibility of the consumer. Incorporating social and consumer considerations into analyses of regulatory structures can enable analyses of the regulation of fintech and move financial services regulation toward providing more socially useful and sustainable financial services. In the future, a behaviourally informed approach to the regulation of fintech may be beneficial and enhance sustainability.

Highlights

  • The second machine age, identified as beginning around 1982, created a wave of digital disruption across many industries [1]

  • Given the above regulatory context in Australia, how can we evaluate the effectiveness of those regulations for the Buy-Now-Pay-Later services (BNPL) form of fintech? To begin, the regulations can be evaluated in terms of their outcomes and resulting behaviour

  • There are a variety of financial services that may fall under the umbrella of being fintech and this paper focuses on BNPL

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The second machine age, identified as beginning around 1982, created a wave of digital disruption across many industries [1]. Regulators have come under pressure to intervene sooner in areas where consumer take-up of fintech focused on consumer spending has been very rapid, when the emerging financial services have been designed with features that knowingly or accidently circumvent current consumer protections for credit provision. This paper will review a behaviourally informed analysis of regulation for a recent fintech offering, buy pay later (BNPL) financial services. It is only relatively recently that BNPL schemes of a similar but not identical form have become increasingly popular These newer types of BNPL schemes are agreements between the consumer and a third party, whereby the third party purchases the credit sale from the merchant and contractually binds the consumer to pay the third party the amount of the sale, usually in instalments.

Three Approaches to Financial Services Regulation
BNPL Regulation around the World—The Broader Context of Comparison
United Kingdom
Canada
New Zealand
Germany
The Specific Context
Evaluating Regulation in Terms of Results and Behaviour
Regulation Being Subject to Capture
Consumer Protection Failures
Specific Academic Consumer Considerations
Findings
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call