Abstract

This study analyzes the efficiency of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) of a national technology innovation research and development (R&D) program. In particular, an empirical analysis is presented that aims to answer the following question: “Is there a difference in the efficiency between R&D collaboration types and between government R&D subsidy sizes?” Methodologically, the efficiency of a government-sponsored R&D project (i.e., GSP) is measured by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), and a nonparametric analysis of variance method, the Kruskal-Wallis (KW) test is adopted to see if the efficiency differences between R&D collaboration types and between government R&D subsidy sizes are statistically significant. This study’s major findings are as follows. First, contrary to our hypothesis, when we controlled the influence of government R&D subsidy size, there was no statistically significant difference in the efficiency between R&D collaboration types. However, the R&D collaboration type, “SME-University-Laboratory” Joint-Venture was superior to the others, achieving the largest median and the smallest interquartile range of DEA efficiency scores. Second, the differences in the efficiency were statistically significant between government R&D subsidy sizes, and the phenomenon of diseconomies of scale was identified on the whole. As the government R&D subsidy size increases, the central measures of DEA efficiency scores were reduced, but the dispersion measures rather tended to get larger.

Highlights

  • Based on a program logic model, public sector research and development (R&D) performance can be evaluated, and the performance efficiency and effectiveness of government-sponsored R&D projects (i.e., GSPs) is analyzed using a variety of methodologies (Wholey 1983; Bickman 1987; Wholey 1987)

  • The present study evaluated the efficiency of GSPs conducted by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) among Knowledge Economy Technology Innovation Program (KETIP) 2012 of Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE) in the Korean government

  • The present study aimed to answer the following question:“ Is there a difference in the efficiency between R&D collaboration types and between government R&D subsidy sizes?” Methodologically, a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model was established to measure the efficiency of each GSP, and DEA input and output variables were chosen by referring to typical program logic models and previous studies relating to national R&D programs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Based on a program logic model, public sector research and development (R&D) performance can be evaluated, and the performance efficiency and effectiveness of government-sponsored R&D projects (i.e., GSPs) is analyzed using a variety of methodologies (Wholey 1983; Bickman 1987; Wholey 1987). In the case of national technology innovation, in R&D programs especially, previous studies are very limited so far regarding whether R&D collaboration as well as government R&D subsidies really matter in creating performance. The sample to be analyzed in the present study is a set of GSPs carried out by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) among Knowledge Economy Technology Innovation Program (KETIP) of Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE) in the Korean government, which is the biggest set of GSPs classified by the recipient types of government R&D subsidy. KETIP is a representative national technology innovation R&D program in the Korean government that aims to achieve economic sales as well as technical intellectual property In this context, the majority of the government R&D subsidy recipients consist of SMEs and large companies in KETIP. Unless stated otherwise, the term “collaboration type” refers to the R&D collaboration type, and the term “government subsidy” refers to the government R&D subsidy

Background
Methods and research models
Single-company 6
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.