Abstract

In this Methods article, we discuss and illustrate a unifying, principled way to analyze response time data from psychological experiments—and all other types of time-to-event data. We advocate the general application of discrete-time event history analysis (EHA) which is a well-established, intuitive longitudinal approach to statistically describe and model the shape of time-to-event distributions. After discussing the theoretical background behind the so-called hazard function of event occurrence in both continuous and discrete time units, we illustrate how to calculate and interpret the descriptive statistics provided by discrete-time EHA using two example data sets (masked priming, visual search). In case of discrimination data, the hazard analysis of response occurrence can be extended with a microlevel speed-accuracy trade-off analysis. We then discuss different approaches for obtaining inferential statistics. We consider the advantages and disadvantages of a principled use of discrete-time EHA for time-to-event data compared to (a) comparing means with analysis of variance, (b) other distributional methods available in the literature such as delta plots and continuous-time EHA methods, and (c) only fitting parametric distributions or computational models to empirical data. We conclude that statistically controlling for the passage of time during data analysis is equally important as experimental control during the design of an experiment, to understand human behavior in our experimental paradigms.

Highlights

  • Many experimental psychologists are still reluctant to embrace event history analysis (EHA) and to stop using analysis of variance (ANOVA) when dealing with time-to-event data

  • While many still assume that response times (RTs) reflect the cumulative duration of all timeconsuming cognitive operations involved in a task (e.g., Liesefeld, 2018; Song & Nakayama, 2009), the results from various discrete-time event history and conditional accuracy analyses show that fast, medium, and slow RTs can index different sets of cognitive operations (Figures 4 and 6; cf. van Zoest et al, 2010)

  • RT and accuracy distributions are a rich source of information on the time course of cognitive processing

Read more

Summary

Methods

Abteilung Allgemeine Psychologie, Fachbereich 06, Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft, Justus-Liebig-Universit€at Gießen, Giessen, Germany

Findings
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call