Abstract
The role of reviewer variation in interpreting outcomes of outpatient clinic chart reviews has been poorly studied. The present study used results collected from a network-based spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel), which is widely available throughout the Army Medical Department, for chart reviews. Data were collected from January 1998 to August 2000, and 2,308 charts of 1,127 patients were reviewed. Results showed a significant improvement in documentation of contact with the referring provider from 1998 to 2000 (55.9% in 1998, 81.6% in 1999, and 80.6% in 2000; p < 0.01 by chi 2 for both). The percentage of charts for new consultations with inadequately controlled blood pressure managed appropriately improved from 73.7% in 1999 to 89.2% in 2000 (p < 0.01 by chi 2). These results persisted in logistic regression analysis controlling for different reviewers. In conclusion, widely available office automation tools allow the systematic analysis of chart review data with the potential to improve practice patterns.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
