Abstract

Though different technical approaches have been applied, Addis Ababa water bodies are persistently facing problems that affect their biological, economic, sociological, and ecological assets. To fill the technical gaps, multi-stakeholder collaborative governance approaches are unfolding, in the academia, as the important tools or methods of dealing with water problems. Thus, the basic objective of this qualitative exploratory study is analyzing the processes and outcomes of multi-stakeholder collaboration structures on the governance of urban water projects, and developing potential pathways of building collaboration among stakeholders for the governance of water bodies. The results of this study show that the processes of multi-stakeholder dialogues are handicapped by the absence of prehistory of collaborations, asymmetrical pre-deliberation communication, and the representation of stakeholders by individuals with no experience or the required expertise, and the lack of willingness among stakeholders to engage in the process of dialogues. The activities of supervision, evaluation, river assessment programs, and the establishment of stable and secured governance frameworks are loaded in a few government sectors, leading to the eruption of multiple problems. On the other hand, the potential pathways of building strong collaboration among stakeholders require a systematic procedure that establishes legal, political, and administrative commonality among stakeholders. This guides to instill responsibility, ownership, and commitment on the leaders, directors, and experts to work with others. The study concludes that urban water problems could not be well addressed unless the governance structures are built in advance by making the pre-deliberation and deliberation processes that combine the principles of simplicity, symmetrical communication with all stakeholders, the appointment of experts, and the development of a regular collaboration system. Further, these would enable to govern water governance projects effectively by combining the ecological, social, political, and economic perspectives. Besides, considering cultural, legal, social, and political contexts and establishing individual and organization sensitive committees at various levels is crucial for sustainability and adaptability.

Highlights

  • The technical approaches of dealing with urban water problems appear to become medieval in the contemporary period in which water problems are becoming more societal and cross-boundary (Holt et al 2012)

  • While several government sectors are involved in collaborative governance forums and systems, other stakeholders are on the other backdoor, compounding and worsening water problems (Environmental Protection Authority of Addis Ababa City 2017; Meklit et al 2017; Woldesenbet 2018)

  • This study examines the practice of multi-stakeholder collaborative governance of urban water projects in Addis Ababa City

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The technical approaches of dealing with urban water problems appear to become medieval in the contemporary period in which water problems are becoming more societal and cross-boundary (Holt et al 2012). Addis Ababa water bodies are suffering from a variety of problems and are making the population vulnerable to various risks, the approaches of dealing with such problems are ineffective and unsustainable (Meklit et al 2017). Weak multi-stakeholder collaboration is the prominent waterrelated problem in Addis Ababa City among a multiplicity of concerns, such as industrial, household, institutional, and pollution-induced problems (Environmental Protection Authority of Addis Ababa City 2008). While several government sectors are involved in collaborative governance forums and systems, other stakeholders are on the other backdoor, compounding and worsening water problems (Environmental Protection Authority of Addis Ababa City 2017; Meklit et al 2017; Woldesenbet 2018). There is a dearth of study that analyzed such affairs in an organized and systematic manner from various contexts

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call