Abstract

<p>This article aims to analyse exclusive leadership practices leading to a negative organizational culture at an internationally renowned HR company. It appeared that the organization made systematic and aggressive efforts to prioritize productivity and efficiency over employees’ sentimental needs. This leadership approach constantly imposed fear on employees to discourage them from voicing opinions and questioning the existing conditions. Members of the organization neither had any meaningful communication nor appropriate information exchange. The absence of mutual trust and respect in the work environment eventually led to organizational failure. As a result, the organization experienced a high employee turnover, productivity gradually declined, and the organization’s growth became stagnant. Leadership, who can see the big picture, understands that prioritizing sentimental needs results in overall performance improvement in the long run. It is possible to see the implications of such a leadership mindset in the organizational culture.</p><p> </p><p><strong>JEL:</strong> J20; J24; L23</p><p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src="/-counters-/edu_01/0933/a.php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>

Highlights

  • This article aims to analyse exclusive leadership practices leading to a negative organizational culture at an internationally renowned HR company

  • We can argue that organizations are socially constructed realities and due to their dynamic nature, they are built for change (Morgan, 2006)

  • Since organizations are the representation of human values and choices, adaptation is fundamental for their existence (Egitim, 2021c)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article aims to analyse exclusive leadership practices leading to a negative organizational culture at an internationally renowned HR company It appeared that the organization made systematic and aggressive efforts to prioritize productivity and efficiency over employees’ sentimental needs. As the HR company’s sole aim was to maximize productivity and efficiency, the leadership practices can be associated with objective ontology which places the reality outside human influence (Hatch & Cunliffe, 2006). In this regard, the focus was on maximizing technical efficiency by rationalizing the social order. Unobservable elements such as emotions, thoughts, and beliefs are perceived as an obstacle ahead of their perceived unshakable reality (Egitim, 2021a; Kabze 2021; Kabze, 2022)

Objectives
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call