Abstract

AbstractThe alignment between corporate strategies and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) can be an indicator of long‐term sustainability success. But which types of companies are most, and which are least, aligned with the SDGs? This paper scores how 67 economic activities—as a proxy for companies' operations and the goods or services they deliver—interact with 59 SDG targets. It then uses network analysis to define which activities are most and least aligned with the SDG Agenda. The results reveal four types of corporate activities, each having a strategic sustainability imperative: (i) “core activities” predominantly generate positive, while having few negative, impacts on the SDGs, challenging companies to scale their contributions to further align with the SDG Agenda; (ii) “mixed activities” have moderate/high degrees of both negative/positive impacts, posing a decoupling imperative; (iii) “opposed activities” provide few benefits yet cause significant adverse impacts, implying that companies must transform in order to better align with the SDGs; and (iv) “peripheral activities” have immaterial positive and negative impacts, creating an imperative to explore innovative avenues for creating SDG contributions. Detailed network graphs are presented that map companies' interactions with the SDGs and guide the creation of corporate sustainability strategies. Policy implications include the potential for using companies' activities as a lever for adopting a “nexus approach” to the SDGs.

Highlights

  • The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) aim to “transform our world.” The 17 SDGs with 169 underlying targets were adopted by all 193 United Nations (UN) member states, forming a “blueprint for shared prosperity in a sustainable world—a world where all people can live productive, vibrant and peaceful lives on a healthy planet” (UN, 2019:2)

  • This paper aims to make a fundamental contribution to this discourse by arguing that strategies that aim to have an impact on sustainable development, as exemplified by the SDGs, need to appreciate the heterogeneity of activities that companies may pursue, as each activity can generate positive and negative impacts on various SDGs

  • Following the method of van Zanten and van Tulder (2018), we reduced this list to 59 SDG targets by (1) removing SDG 17, since it is an overarching goal dedicated to strengthening the means of implementation; (2) working with the 107 substantive targets of SDGs 1–16, thereby removing “means of implementation” targets; and (3) excluding targets which could not significantly be foreseen to be impacted by economic activities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) aim to “transform our world.” The 17 SDGs with 169 underlying targets were adopted by all 193 United Nations (UN) member states, forming a “blueprint for shared prosperity in a sustainable world—a world where all people can live productive, vibrant and peaceful lives on a healthy planet” (UN, 2019:2). The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) aim to “transform our world.”. If progress towards achieving the SDGs is to be accelerated, the private sector's impacts on sustainable development need to be better understood (cf van Zanten & van Tulder, 2020a, 2020b). This is relevant for informing how these global goals might be advanced at a policy (macro) level. It offers relevant inputs for creating business strategies that improve corporate impacts on sustainable development (at a micro-level)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call