Abstract

Since tracking students into different classes based on grades is a popular teaching method in high schools in the United States, this paper analyzes and critiques it in light of learning theories like behaviorism and cognitivism. It is discovered that tracking is still problematic according to various learning theories, even though this system of education is relatively common. This paper then examines the effectiveness of Competency-based education and peer assessment as potential alternatives to track. The implementability of these three models in Chinese institutions is also briefly discussed in this work. This study offers a deeper understanding of tracking as well as ideas on how to use the tracking technique and potential substitutes to enhance the effectiveness and results of students learning.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call