Abstract

Drip irrigation has the potential to help farmers increase crop production with lower on-farm water consumption than flood or sprinkler irrigation; yet, its high costs keep it out of reach for many smallholder farmers, who make up about 20% of the world’s population. Pressure-compensating (PC) drip emitters enable uniform water delivery to all crops in a field by regulating the emitter flow rate, but typically require high pumping pressures, contributing to high capital and operating costs for the pump and power system. Redesigning PC emitters for lower pressure operation could enable more energy-efficient and affordable drip systems. However, the current lack of published design theory for PC emitters hinders the development of emitters with desired hydraulic performance. To address this gap, we present an analytical, parametric model for the hydraulic behavior (i.e., the flow rate versus pressure curve) of inline PC emitters before the flow-regulating regime. We combine this model with a validated prototyping method to demonstrate its utility in the design of PC emitters with target activation pressures and flow rates, and demonstrate a sample design that achieves 38% lower activation pressure than commercial emitters with similar flow rates. The proposed model sheds light on the parametric relationships between PC emitter geometry and performance. It may inform R&D efforts in the irrigation industry and lead to improved emitter designs with low operating pressures, helping reduce drip system costs and increase access to drip irrigation among smallholder farmers.

Highlights

  • The use of drip irrigation in agriculture has been growing amidst concerns over water scarcity and insufficient crop yields (Foley et al 2011)

  • This paper presents analytical theory describing the hydraulic performance of inline drip irrigation emitters and demonstrates its application to the design of improved lowpressure emitters that minimize pumping power

  • The resulting prototype reduced Pact by 38% compared to the commercial emitter it was based on, while maintaining a similar flow rate

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of drip irrigation in agriculture has been growing amidst concerns over water scarcity and insufficient crop yields (Foley et al 2011). In a number of studies, well-managed and properly maintained drip systems have shown reductions of water use of 26–65% compared to flood or furrow irrigation, while attaining similar or higher crop yields (Bernstein and Francois 1973; Hanson et al 1997; Cetin and Bilgel 2002; Narayanamoorthy 2004; Maisiri et al 2005; Ibragimov et al 2007; Ghamarnia et al 2011). These water savings stem from reduced evaporation and deep percolation, as water is delivered through pipes and drip emitters directly to the roots of every crop in the field. Reducing the cost of drip irrigation could allow more farmers to take advantage of its benefits, especially in locations where water is scarce or expensive (Srivastava et al 2003)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call