Abstract
AbstractWork zone capacity is a key variable in scheduling construction activity on roadways. Understanding the effect of different definitions of capacity on the values computed from field data will result in better planning and scheduling of lane closures. Capacity values obtained using three different definitions (and methods) of capacity: (1) maximum sustained flow, (2) rescaled cumulative flow curves, and (3) 85th percentile flow were compared using field data from short-term work zones in Missouri. The queue discharge flow (QDF) values were found to be the most conservative estimates of capacity. The 85th percentile flows were lower than the 15-min sustained flow values in all but one location. The prequeue flow (PQF) values, indicative of near-constant flow prior to breakdown, did not occur in any of the four work zones. The four-site average capacities were 1,149, 1,267 and 1,301 vphpl for QDF, 85th percentile flow, and 15-min sustained flow, respectively. These capacity values were close to the 1...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.