Abstract

Counterbalanced forklift trucks (FLT) are frequently used in combination with interchangeable equipment in order to handle loads in different manners. The main risks which may arise after assembling interchangeable equipment to a FLT are related to the loss of stability of the assembly. Actually, the presence of interchangeable equipment and the associated payload may change in a significant way the overall centre of gravity with respect to the FLT in its basic configuration with forks. Therefore, the stability limits of the assembly, based on the same footprints on the ground of the FLT alone, are affected by the position of the overall centre of gravity. Thus, the presence of interchangeable equipment could reduce the functionality (e.g., lifting capability, lifting height, etc.) of the FLT in order to continue its stability during use. Often, interchangeable equipment is placed on the market by manufacturers other than the FLT manufacturer. In these cases, the correct and safe coupling of the interchangeable equipment with the FLT is the responsibility of the manufacturers of interchangeable equipment, including the stability risk assessment. Thus, the interchangeable equipment manufacturer should have access to the relevant information of the FLT concerning operative and structural features and its configuration as a procedure for assessing the correct and safe coupling. Otherwise, he should perform experimental stability tests for each model of FLT so that its interchangeable equipment can be fitted. Specific research activity is developed in order to define an analytical procedure to assess the stability of FLT when assembled with interchangeable equipment. Specific typologies of FLTs and interchangeable equipment have been selected in order to better characterise the case study. The analytical equations mimic the static stability tests. The results achieved have been compared to experimental data in order to optimise the procedure. The results attained by the application of the analytical procedure to all the combinations of main typologies of FLTs and the interchangeable equipment selected showed good agreement with experimental tests.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.