ANALYTIC/JUNGIAN PSYCHOTHERAPY AND SAME‐SEX/QUEER DESIRE: RESEARCH FINDINGS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORY, PRACTICE AND TRAINING

Abstract

AbstractHistorically, analytic/Jungian psychotherapy has pathologised same‐sex/queer desire and excluded lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) and queer individuals from training as therapists. A mixed‐method study, conducted between 2014 and 2021, aimed to clarify how UK analytic/Jungian therapists working today thought about theory, clinical practice and training in relation to same‐sex/queer desire. A total of 287 registrants of the British Psychoanalytic Council (BPC) completed a clinical attitudes questionnaire, a 20% response rate. The quantitative and qualitative data were descriptively and thematically analysed. Using a purposive sampling technique, 36 analytic/Jungian therapists were interviewed. A Framework Analysis identified 10 overarching themes. Analytic/Jungian therapists are now better informed about some LGB/queer‐specific issues, such as internalised homophobia/biphobia and the challenges of living in a heterosexually structured society, but many continue to hold predominantly heteronormative and monosexual perspectives on love, relationships and sex. Some thinking and clinical practice with LGB/queer clients remains biased, out‐dated and potentially harmful. Despite some innovation and progress, not all trainings adequately cover LGB/queer‐specific issues, and anti‐LGB/queer discrimination persists at some training organisations. UK analytic/Jungian training organisations must continue their efforts to create non‐discriminatory learning and professional environments for LGB/queer individuals. This may involve further revision of the analytic/Jungian curriculum on same‐sex/queer desire and institutional reform consistent with BPC equality and non‐discrimination policies.