Abstract

Selecting the best materials that ensure maximum performance is crucial in the construction engineering design of any construction project. However, this is challenging and usually not properly considered because of the lack of systematic and scientific evaluation methods for the performance of materials. This paper proposes a new approach of selecting material to satisfy the performance goal of material designers in building constructions based on the analytic hierarchy process method. To validate the suggested model, a case study was conducted for a concrete system form, the performance of which is susceptible to its materials and has a strong effect on overall project productivity. The newly developed form comprising polymers and alloys showed that the proposed material selection model provided a better combination of materials, and the solution was technically more advanced and ensured better performance. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by expanding the understanding of how construction material properties affect project performance and provides a guideline for material engineers to select the best-performing building materials while considering a performance goal.

Highlights

  • Material selection is one of the most important yet complex tasks encountered by construction engineers, because it is directly related to overall project performance [1]

  • The high-pressure laminate (HPL)-coated plywood panel is the second-highest alternative for the panel, so we tested it with PP panel during the field test

  • This study proposed a material selection model for construction materials and applied the model to a concrete form, a key temporary resource in building construction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Material selection is one of the most important yet complex tasks encountered by construction engineers, because it is directly related to overall project performance (e.g., time, cost, and quality) [1]. Construction engineers must select the best-performing materials based on the mechanical (e.g., specific strength and elasticity modulus), functional (e.g., noise reduction, corrosion resistance, and nonadhesiveness), and physical (e.g., density, color, and thermal conductivity [TC]) properties of the materials in the selection process in association with cost [2,3]. These evaluation criteria are often in conflict with each other, because an optimal selection for one criterion could sacrifice other criteria [2].

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call