Abstract
Both the popular press and research literature report increasing use of short-horizon earnings guidance (referred to hereafter as warnings), primarily before negative earnings surprises.1 While it is claimed that investors and analysts have little tolerance for disappointments, feel misled by the failure to warn, lose confidence in management, and vote with their feet by selling off their shares in companies which do not warn, Kasznik and Lev [1995] reported findings suggesting the opposite. Specifically, they found that, controlling for the magnitude of the negative earnings surprise, firms that warn tend to experience more negative stock price reactions, and more negative analyst earnings forecast revisions, than those providing no warning. In this paper, we investigate analysts' reactions to qualitative warnings of adverse earnings and attempt to reconcile analysts' more negative forecast revisions, as documented by Kasznik and Lev [1995], and the apparently conflicting anecdotal evidence that suggests more positive responses
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
