Abstract

In 1967, the American language philosopher Grice proposed the cooperative principle, which provided a new theoretical framework for conversation analysis. In the following decades, the cooperative principle has been a trending topic of discussion in linguistics and continuously developed. Leech’s politeness principle and Wilson and Sperber’s relative theory have improved the cooperation principle from different aspects. The cooperative principle has been widely applied in the analysis of conversations in films, dramas, and literature, which contributes to a holistic understanding of characterization and dramatic conflicts. In this paper, doctor-patient dialogues in The Good Doctor Season 1 are analyzed from the theoretical perspective of the cooperative principle. It can be discerned that healthcare workers should comply with the maxim of quality and quantity, to no little extent, when communicating with patients. However, in different contexts, healthcare workers sometimes choose to deliberately violate the maxim of relation and manner in order to achieve better communication effects, such as helping patients understand their conditions or relieving patients’ tension. This paper intends to provide effective suggestions for real-life doctor-patient communication by applying the cooperative principle to the corpus analysis in The Good Doctor Season 1, so as to improve the communication efficiency of both parties and create a harmonious doctor-patient relationship.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.