Abstract

Different extraction and clean-up techniques used before HPLC analysis were compared in order to obtain a reliable method for the quantitative determination of zearalenone (ZEA) and α-zearalenol (α-ZOL) in animal feed. Immunoaffinity clean-up was compared to C 18 and Florisil column clean-up. Extracted samples were analysed by reversed-phase HPLC with fluorescence detection ( λ ex=274 nm, λ em=440 nm). A mobile phase of acetonitrile:water (50:50 (v/v)) and a flow-rate of 1.0 ml min −1 resulted in a good separation between ZEA and α-ZOL. Using immunoaffinity clean-up the linear range was between 25 and 600 μg kg −1 for ZEA and α-ZOL in maize. Intra-laboratory coefficients of variation (CV) (under repeatability conditions) were 9.16% for ZEA and 2.18% for α-ZOL. Recoveries for spiked ZEA and α-ZOL samples ranged from 89 to 110% with CVs between 5.2 and 11.2% (under within-laboratory reproducibility conditions). Using C 18 and Florisil solid-phase clean-up, matrix interference was too high. Therefore, naturally contaminated animal feed samples were analysed using the developed HPLC method coupled to the immunoaffinity clean-up.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.