Abstract

In an agricultural field, monitoring the temporal changes in soil conditions can be as important as understanding spatial heterogeneity when it comes to determining the locally-optimized application rates of key agricultural inputs. For example, the monitoring of soil water content is needed to decide on the amount and timing of irrigation. On-the-go soil sensing technology provides a way to rapidly obtain high-resolution, multiple data layers to reveal soil spatial variability, at a relatively low cost. To take advantage of this information, it is important to define the locations, which represent diversified field conditions, in terms of their potential to store and release soil water. Choosing the proper locations and the number of soil monitoring sites is not straightforward. In this project, sensor-based maps of soil apparent electrical conductivity and field elevation were produced for seven agricultural fields in Nebraska, USA. In one of these fields, an eight-node wireless sensor network was used to establish real-time relationships between these maps and the Water Stress Potential (WSP) estimated using soil matric potential measurements. The results were used to model hypothetical WSP maps in the remaining fields. Different placement schemes for temporal soil monitoring sites were evaluated in terms of their ability to predict the hypothetical WSP maps with a different range and magnitude of spatial variability. When a large number of monitoring sites were used, it was shown that the probability for uncertain model predictions was relatively low regardless of the site selection strategy. However, a small number of monitoring sites may be used to reveal the underlying relationship only if these locations are chosen carefully.

Highlights

  • When pursuing site-specific crop management, temporal variability in soil water content is frequently as important as spatial variability

  • This increase was moderate for the most successful random monitoring site selection and for the optimized selection, but the chance of the random site selection producing a high Mean Squared Error (MSE) increased with a decreasing number of sites

  • Apparent soil electrical conductivity and field elevation data layers were mapped using on-the-go soil sensing technology. Both data layers were associated with soil water holding capacity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When pursuing site-specific crop management, temporal variability in soil water content is frequently as important as spatial variability. In order to optimize irrigation water management, one should combine the knowledge of changes of soil water holding capacity across a field with temporal monitoring of the actual water content available to plants during the most critical phases of crop production. Implementing this “precision irrigation” strategy means optimizing both the quantity and the timing of irrigation that may vary across a field due to different soil and growing conditions. Sensor-based maps have been used to define the spatial variability of soil properties influencing water movement and storage across a landscape, and this information has been used to define relatively homogeneous management zones that have been evaluated separately [2]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call