Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the university students' views on Web 2.0 tools and their level of use of Web 2.0 tools according to the variables of gender, Foreign Language Level, Computer usage level and frequency of access to the internet. The study group consists of 427 students who continue their studies at the Ahmet Kele?o?lu Faculty of Education of Necmettin Erbakan University in the academic year 2019-2020. The data in the study was taken with a three-part tool. In the first section, demographic characteristics of the students who participated in the research were determined. In the second section, the frequencies of use of Web 2.0 technologies were asked. In the third section, students were asked about their skills in using Web 2.0 tools. Data were analyzed by statistical package programs. T-test and variance analysis were used to determine whether the students' views on Web 2.0 tools differ according to gender, foreign language level, computer usage level and frequency of access to the internet. The Scheffe test was used to determine which group the differentiation originated from. In terms of the frequency of use of Web 2.0, men are significantly different from women, those who have computers and those who are connected to the internet for 7 hours and more than others. In terms of Web 2.0 skill level, men are significantly different from women, those who have computers, those who have 7 hours and more internet connections, compared to others.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.