Abstract

In this paper we develop a theoretical framework which enables us to analyze the throughput and fairness performance of various downlink scheduling schemes in WCDMA networks. For theoretical analysis, the following scheduling schemes are considered: (i) the round robin scheme, (ii) the maximum carrier-to-interference ratio (C/I) scheme and (iii) the proportional fair scheme. By deriving a close approximation to the probability density function of C/I, new, exact throughput and fairness expressions are formulated for the above scheduling schemes, by which a rigorous quantitative comparison among them can be performed. The results verify that throughput and fairness performance of each scheduling scheme depends largely on mobile users' location in the active cell. In general, the round robin scheme has the worst throughput performance among them, while the proportional fair scheme provides a better trade-off between throughput and fairness

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.