Abstract

The paper analyses the problems of the influence of direction of helical teeth in the universal helical gear reducer on service life of the bearings that support the reducer shaft, i.e. on the overall load carrying capacity of universal gear reducer. Directions of helical teeth for all gear units is adopted in that way that the overall axial force at the reducer shaft is lowest as possible, i.e. axial forces of a shaft are in counterbalance. It is a practice the same output gear pair is used within a helical gear reducer made in universal casing for two- and three-stage gear reducer. However, these gears are produced with different directions of helical teeth in order to obtain the lowest axial force on the fifth geared shaft. However, some gear reducer manufacturers, trying to simplify the production and reduce the number of manufactured components, produce the gears with the same helical teeth direction for both two- and three-stage gear reducers. In that way, they do not reduce the value of axial force on the fifth geared shaft in three-stage gear unit, but they make addition of axial forces that certainly affects the service life of the bearings and thus the overall load carrying capacity of the gearbox. Analysing the concrete case, this paper researches the justification of implementation this procedure.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.