Abstract

This paper studies the impact of different forecasting techniques on the inventory bullwhip effect in two parallel supply chains with the competition effect, which is in contrast to the situation of a single product in a serial supply chain. In particular, this paper constructs two parallel supply chains, each of which includes one manufacturer and one retailer. Moreover, the market demand is impacted by the self-price sensitivity coefficient, the cross-price sensitivity coefficient, the market share, and the demand shock. We then assumed that the retailer can forecast market demand by using different forecasting techniques (i.e., the moving average technique (MA), the exponential smoothing technique (ES), and the minimum mean square error technique (MMSE)). We constructed the quantity model of the bullwhip effect and the inventory bullwhip effect. Finally, we analyzed the impact of different forecasting techniques and market share on the inventory bullwhip effect. We analyzed the conditions under which the retailers should choose different types of forecasting techniques on the basis of the inventory bullwhip effect. The results show that the MMSE forecasting technique can reduce the lead-time demand forecast error to the largest extent, and the inventory bullwhip effect can obtain the lowest level using the MMSE method: retailer-1 can reduce the inventory bullwhip effect by using the MA technique, when the self-price sensitivity coefficient, the price autoregressive coefficient, and the probabilities associated with customers choosing retailer-1’s product are very low.

Highlights

  • Demand amplification is the primary obstacle to achieving coordination and maintaining harmony at different stages of supply chains and is termed as the bullwhip effect (BWE).e bullwhip is the phenomenon of information distortion as ordering information percolates upstream, which means that a downstream demand fluctuation will lead to a larger fluctuation in the variance of upstream ordering [1, 2]. e application of the simple two-level supply chain modeling assumption is a widespread method for studying the bullwhip effect (e.g., [1, 3,4,5,6])

  • With the development of the economy and society, in many industries, the traditional model of a simple two-level supply chain, which is used to address the issue of the bullwhip effect, is evolving into a new model that reflects a chain-to-chain competition effect which is caused by the substitutability of homogeneous products. is competition effect means that the firm is affected by others within the same supply chain, but is affected by firms from other supply chains

  • The previous studies have many limitations: (1) the objective is mainly concentrated on the two-level or multilevel supply chain, and few scholars considered twolevel or multilevel supply chain networks that consist of two manufacturers and two retailers; (2) many scholars assumed that they trade one kind of product between different firms, and fewer studies considered trades in two different kinds of products which are substitutable between different firms; (3) most studies discussed the impact of lead time, the moving average period, and other factors on the bullwhip effect, and fewer researchers studied the impact of different kinds of forecasting techniques on the inventory bullwhip effect

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Demand amplification is the primary obstacle to achieving coordination and maintaining harmony at different stages of supply chains and is termed as the bullwhip effect (BWE). Ma et al [7] derived the analytical expressions of the bullwhip effect on product orders and inventory using the minimum mean squared error (MMSE), moving average (MA), and exponential smoothing (ES) forecasting techniques in a simple two-level supply chain with one manufacturer and one retailer. They did not discuss the impact of different forecasting techniques on the inventory bullwhip effect in two parallel supply chain systems.

Literature Review
Parameters and Modeling Assumption and Problem Description
Ordering Process of the Two Retailers
The Inventory Bullwhip Effect under Different Forecasting Techniques
Simulation and Result Analysis
Analysis of Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call