Abstract
When a Francis turbine operates at partial load or very high load, the swirling flow in the draft tube may cause objectionable oscillations of pressure and power. The cavitating core of the vortex plays an important role in these pulsations. The present paper deals with a class of self-excited oscillations of the entire water column in the power plant; self-excitation means that at least one eigenvalue of the hydraulic system becomes unstable. A one-dimensional (1D) model in frequency domain explains how the normal damping is eliminated. Oscillation power is provided in regions whose flow gain in streamwise direction has a component in phase with pressure. The model contains a module for the dynamic transmission behavior of the cavitating vortex; it represents the response of the cavity size to variations of the local pressure and swirl. The sensitivity to pressure changes (the ‘cavitation compliance’) controls the natural frequencies but cannot cause instability whereas the response to swirl changes (‘mass flow gain’) may supply net oscillation energy and thus cause instability. Both influences act all along the cavitating part of the vortex; it is crucial that the variation of runner exit swirl can propagate along the vortex only with the axial velocity of the fluid. The oscillation energy balance depends on the wavelength of swirl variation, i.e. the combination of axial velocity and oscillation frequency. All instabilities of this class are ‘breathing’ pulsations, synchronous within one cross section. In the simplest case with the lowest natural frequency the pressure variation is roughly synchronous in the whole draft tube; for this mode (full-load surge) a lumped-parameter model may be adequate. By contrast, the upper-part-load pulsation occurs in a more complex eigenmode; a distributed-parameter model version is required to represent the essential features. The draft tube pressure oscillation has two quarter waves and a pressure node within the cavitation zone. The pressure at both ends of the draft tube cavitation zone has roughly opposite phase. Difficulties to transpose the stability between reduced-scale model and prototype are explained using the 1D model, as well as some influence of the runner hub shape and of the upstream conduit. Damping at the runner explains why the pulsation is limited to low-head turbines.
Highlights
Since its discovery in the early 1990s [2][3], the upper part load pulsation of the Francis turbines has been described in several publications, sometimes in considerable detail [4]. It has a well-known set of properties by which it qualifies as a self-excited breathing pulsation of the vortex cavity in the draft tube; this is described in Part I of this analysis [9]
A one-dimensional model of the cavitating draft tube flow embedded in a linear time-invariant hydraulic system model is examined in frequency domain using a transfer matrix method
As the swirl is attached to the fluid particles, it cannot propagate with the velocity of pressure waves but only with the axial velocity of flow
Summary
Since its discovery in the early 1990s [2][3], the upper part load pulsation of the Francis turbines has been described in several publications, sometimes in considerable detail [4]. Cavitating flow regions having non-zero mass flow gain can sometimes fulfil this condition Brennen identified this effect as the source of instability in systems containing cavitating inducer pumps. As the swirl is attached to the fluid particles, it cannot propagate with the velocity of pressure waves but only with the axial velocity of flow It is the derivative VC/ Q (= ) of this curve that can promote instability; the shaded regions with steep slope are candidates for self-excited pulsations
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
