Analysis of the correlation between radiological and audiological features of patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct

Abstract

Objective: The radiological and audiological results of patients with hearing loss associated with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) were analyzed statistically to explore the association between them. Methods: In this retrospective study, we screened 64 patients (128 ears) with EVA diagnosed in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from January 2012 to June 2016, who met the inclusion criteria and the exclusion criteria at the same time, including 37 males (74 ears) and 27 females (54 ears), aged from 6 months to 17 years, all of whom showed varying degrees of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). The imaging observations included the midpoint measurement (MP) and the operculum measurement(OP) of the temporal bone HRCT, the long signal area cross-sectional area (ES(L)), the short signal area cross-sectional area (ES(S)), as well as the largest total signal area cross-sectional area (ES(T)) of the endolymphatic sac(ES) of the cochlear MRI. The audiological observations included collecting detailed medical history and subjective and/or objective audiological examinations to determine the character and degree of hearing loss. According to the progress and changes of hearing loss, they were divided into hearing stability group (86 ears) and fluctuation/progression group (42 ears). SPSS22.0 statistical software was used to carry out statistical analysis of the imaging measurement results. Results: The sizes of MP and OP were smaller in the stable group than those in the fluctuating/progressive group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). For ES(L), ES(S) or ES(T), there was no significant difference between the stable group and the fluctuating/progressive group (P>0.05). For the 13 patients with asymmetric hearing loss, the sizes of MP, OP, ES(L), ES(S) or ES(T) were not significantly different between the mild side and the serious side (P>0.05). For the ears whose ES(L)/ES(S) was>2 or the ES(S)/ES(L) was>2, the proportion was not significantly different between the stable group and the fluctuating/progressive group (P>0.05). Conclusions: For patients with EVA,the smaller the enlarged vestibular aqueduct is,the more likely it is congenital severe sensorineural hearing loss. Patients with significantly enlarged vestibular aqueduct often exhibit volatility/progressive hearing loss. The degree of enlargement of the endolymphatic vessels and endolymphatic sac is not related to the degree of hearing loss. For EVA patients with asymmetric hearing loss, the mild or serious side of hearing loss is random, which is not affected by the degree of enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct and endolymphatic sac. The degree of hearing loss in patients with EVA is not related to the ratio of ES(L)/ES(S).