Abstract
In this paper we analyze the argumentation of nine-year-olds as they justify their reasoning for a fraction comparison problem. We illustrate how their proof-like arguments evolve in a class discussion and are backed by the rod models they produce, showing both valid and invalid arguments.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
