Abstract
This paper discusses the analysis of the post-reform 2019 Sudanese conflict between the Sudanese military or Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) against Sudanese paramilitaries or Rapid Support Forces (RSF). This research uses qualitative research methods through a juridical study approach to international humanitarian law. This law is a set of rules governing the law of armed conflict, armed conflict is divided into two: international armed conflict and non-international armed conflict. The conflict between the SAF and RSF is included in non-international armed conflicts. Based on ACLED data, this armed conflict has a major impact on aspects of life such as: civilians are fatalities; health facilities are not functioning; children who are unable to access education; until logistical access is disrupted. Thus, this conflict requires conflict resolution efforts using the multi-track diplomacy (MTD) method using the second track using non-state actors as mediators to build the game. Through the United Nations which encouraged the United States and Saudi Arabia as mediators who produced the Jeddah declaration.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
