Abstract

In order to attain a reliable laboratory work assessment, we argue taking the Learning Environment as a core concept and a research paradigm that considers the factors affecting the laboratory as a particularly complex educational context. With regard to Laboratory Learning Environments (LLEs), a well known approach is the SLEI (Science Laboratory Environment Inventory). The aim of this research is to design and apply an alternative and qualitative assessment tool to characterize Laboratory Learning Environments in an introductory course of organic chemistry. An alternative and qualitative assessment tool would be useful for providing feed-back for experimental learning improvement; serving as a complementary triangulation tool in educational research on LLEs; and generating meaningful categories in order to design quantitative research instruments. Toward this end, spontaneous questions by students have been chosen as a reliable source of information. To process these questions, a methodology based on the Grounded Theory has been developed to provide a framework for characterizing LLEs. This methodology has been applied in two case studies. The conclusions lead us to argue for using more holistic assessment tools in both everyday practice and research. Likewise, a greater attention should be paid to metacognition to achieve suitable self-perception concerning students’ previous knowledge and manipulative skills.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Laboratory work from a comprehensive viewpoint of educational assessmentA comprehensive viewpoint of educational assessment emphasizes its role as a tool for learning improvement

  • In order to improve the display of this theoretical framework, the network from Atlas.ti is later transformed by means of CmapTools®

  • The theoretical framework established from the SGQ analysis provides noteworthy categories in line with categories indicated in the literature (Hofstein, Nahum & Shore, 2001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.1 Laboratory work from a comprehensive viewpoint of educational assessment. A comprehensive viewpoint of educational assessment emphasizes its role as a tool for learning improvement. This is relevant with regard to laboratory activities since these involve many different specific competences related to the following phases (Hofstein, 2004): (a) planning and design, (b) performance; (c) analysis and interpretation and (d) application. The execution of each of these activities is highly influenced by countless contextual issues. Several generic competences have significant weight in laboratory activities, those concerning communication skills, cooperative work, and decision making. The influence of infrastructural issues concerning organization and management of educational resources are much greater than those involved in ordinary classroom activities.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call