Abstract

This study reports the types of spelling errors made by the beginner learners of English in the EFL context as well as the major sources underpinning such errors in contextual writing composition tasks. Data were collected from written samples of 122 EFL students (male and female) enrolled in the intensive English language programme during the preparatory year at the University of Ha'il in Saudi Arabia. Students were given 1.5 hours to write on one of four different descriptive topics related to their life and culture. The spelling errors found in the writing samples was analysed and classified intofour categories of errors according to Cook’s Classification: omission, substitution, insertion, and transposition. An analysis of errors established that errors of omission constituted the highest proportion of errors. The majority of learners’ spelling errors were related to a wrong use of vowels and pronunciation. When uncertain about accurate spellings, beginner learners often associated a wide range of vowel and consonant combinations in an attempt to spell words accurately, sometimes even combining two distinct lexical items by overlapping vowels. The findings suggest that spelling errors are mainly the outcome of anomalies existing in the target language of the learners as well as L1 interference from their internalized Arabic language system.

Highlights

  • In Saudi context, English is taught as a foreign language (EFL), in which students are supposed to master the four language skills

  • We examine each of the major error types individually as well as the main sources of errors

  • Errors in spelling were categorized according to OSIT (Omission, Substitution, Insertion, and Transposition)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In Saudi context, English is taught as a foreign language (EFL), in which students are supposed to master the four language skills. As an important component of writing, spelling poses a major challenge to most beginner learners of English, resulting in misspelled words and incoherent sentences Hyland (2003). Bean and Bouffler (1987) claimed that, ‘Standard spelling has assumed importance beyond the function it plays in written language. These difficulties have been attributed to a number of causes, such as the differences in the orthographic system between Arabic and English, and first language (L1) interference. These spelling difficulties cause many spelling errors which negatively affect the writing proficiency of Arab students (Saiegh-Haddad, 2004). As the researchers, claim that spelling in the Saudi context has not been given the priority it deserves

Literature Review
Overview
Participants
Results and Discussion
Errors of Omission
Errors of Substitution
Errors of Insertion
Errors of Transposition
Conclusion
Implications for Teaching L2 Writing
Limitations of the Study
Recommendations for Further Research
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call