Analysis of Selection of Recipient Vein, Number of Outflows, Style and Technique in Head and Neck Venous Anastomosis and a Proposed Algorithm

Abstract

Surgeons have preferential ways of performing venous anastomosis in head and neck microsurgery. However, controversies exist regarding the superiority of each method. This study aims to determine the effects of these variables on the rates of thrombosis and flap failure, and propose an algorithm to be used as a facilitator in the decision-making process. A total of 208 microsurgical reconstructions on 199 patients from a single surgeon's data were evaluated. Selection of recipient vein (superficial vs. deep), style of anastomosis (end-to-end vs. end-to-side), number of outflows (one vs. two) and technique of anastomosis (hand-sewn vs. coupler) were compared. Selection was done according to the pre- and intraoperative plan, as well as, surgeon's clinical judgement. Outcomes were determined as rates of venous thrombosis and flap failure. Five patients (2.4%) had venous problems, leading to two partial and three total flap failures. Selection of the recipient vein, style and number of outflows did not affect the outcomes, whereas coupler use decreased the rates of venous thrombosis and flap failure (p=0.008). Although it is difficult to set dogmatic criteria to achieve consistent outcomes, coupler use in this study prevented flap failure. An algorithmic approach was proposed with the results of the data and literature to increase the success in microsurgical anastomosis. Surgeons should use algorithms and sound judgement with adherence to microsurgical principles to obtain the best results for each patient.