Abstract
This research paper examines the legal principles surrounding the defense of intoxication under Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 85 and 86 (now Sections 23 and 24 under Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023). These sections distinguish between involuntary and voluntary intoxication in criminal acts, specifying the conditions under which an accused can claim intoxication as a defense. This analysis is contextualized through the case of Basdev vs. State of Pepsu,1956 wherein the appellant, under voluntary intoxication, committed homicide. The paper traces historical perspectives on intoxication as a defense, scrutinizes the application of intent and knowledge in criminal liability, and critically evaluates the court’s rationale in affirming the conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder, rather than reducing it to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 IPC. The findings underscore that voluntary intoxication does not absolve criminal liability if the accused possesses sufficient awareness of their actions and the consequences. The study concludes with an affirmation of the Supreme Court’s judgment, emphasizing the significance of recklessness and behavioral assessment in applying Section 86 IPC.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.