Abstract
Aim: Prospective analysis of results of primary closure in fistula in ano in terms of (a) Immediate- Bleeding, perianal haematoma, pain, suture line dehiscence and healingperiod. (b) Later - Incontinence & reccurence rate and Patient’s compliance & feasibility of technique in NSCBMC Jabalpur. Methods: Prospective study was conducted in Department of Surgery, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpurbetween Aug. 2012 to Sept. 2013. Total 60 patients were taken and divided in two groups, group-A (30 patients) taken as case study in which pimary closure was done and group-B (30 patients) taken as control group in which open fistulectomy was done. Results: Majority of patients were 31 to 60 years (80%). More number of males than females. (M=93.3%, F=6.7%). Perianal Discharge (90%), Pain (56.7%) and Swelling (33.3%) were the main complaints. Fistula-in-ano with a single opening (83.3%) was the commonest occurrence and posterior opening (70%) situation was more common. Bleeding was seen in open method (group-B=30%) whereas none of the patients shows bleeding in primary closure technique (group-A). Perianal haematoma was more seen in open method (group-B=20%) compare to primary closure method (group-A=6.6%).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
